As contribuições do professor coordenador de área de ciências da natureza no desenvolvimento da recuperação paralela

Abstract

The present dissertation was conducted within the scope of the Professional Master’s course in Management and Evaluation of Education (PPGP) of the Public Policies and Evaluation of Education Center at the Federal University of Juiz de Fora (CAEd/UFJF). The management case tried to relate and distinguish what is stated by the academic literature about the parallel recovery process, the general recovery and its implications on the Natural Science’s teaching process at school. To do so, different researches from the Field have been used as a base to this dissertation. This dialogue was important because, through this research, we could investigate how the Field’s Coordinator Teacher (FCT) can collaborate to the parallel recovery and how this recovery can also impact this subject’s learning process at the researched school, located at Fortaleza/CE. So, the general objective was to identify in which way the FCT can contribute to the recovery process during the school’s year, together with the field’s teachers. This case was chosen because the researcher is an FCT at the investigated school. So, he is responsible for verifying the taught contents and if those are according to the year’s plan. Besides, the FCT has also to evaluate the classes’ development. In this research, there were used, as methodology, two questionnaires, which were applied to the Science’s teachers from this school. All the data were also analyzed using the Content Analysis methodology. Through this study, we could think about the following themes: (i) the Natural Science’s teachers profile that work at the studied school; ii) the work routine; (iii) the main teaching and learning difficulties; (iv) the FCT’s work; and (v) the parallel recovery process. According to the analysis, there was also proposed an Educational Action Plan (EAP), which has the goal of helping the school to advance on its teaching results. All the suggested actions must be always evaluated so that the process can be more effective.