Pacto Nacional pela Alfabetização na Idade Certa (PNAIC): caminhos percorridos pelo programa e opiniões de professores alfabetizadores sobre a formação docente

Abstract

This thesis aims to answer the following question: Programs offered by the Ministry of Education have influenced the practice of the teacher and consequently in student learning? Thus, aims to analyze the opinions of graduates of training courses of the National Pact for Literacy in the Age One (PNAIC) on the results and effects of teacher training offered by the program in the mining town of New Bridge (MG). For this work, they considered the training in English language and mathematics, as well as the Compact features in the period 2012 to 2015. We started from the premise that the continued training of teachers may cause changes in teaching practices that contribute to improving the quality of education. The choice of PNAIC as object is due to the program's scope in the national scene, and the research sought to follow the trajectory of the policy as a way to understand the conditions of its implementation in the city. Opting for New Bridge was made on the basis of professional experiences by the author - researcher in this place and especially the fact that the municipality require support from the Ministry of Education to facilitate teacher training. The discussion presented in the theoretical framework addresses the national policy of teacher training, in order to contextualize the subject of research and place your object. Later, discusses "How to train good teachers?", outlining, from this inquiry, a scope of features that have been interpreted as important and necessary for training quality process and assisted in the analysis of PNAIC training courses in this study. The theoretical foundations are based on the contributions of Antonio Novoa, Bernadette Angelina Gatti, Francisco Imbernon, Marli Eliza Damalzo Afonso André, among others. The development of the thesis, the methodological aspect, articulated the qualitative and quantitative approaches, making use of bibliographic research, documentary and field. For the fieldwork, data collection instruments used were individual interviews and group and questionnaire. Interpretation of the data was through content analysis and statistical analysis using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Program (IBM SPSS). It can be said that the PNAIC reached the expected positive results and produced direct and indirect effects on the pedagogical practices of teachers and participants in the institutional setting, as opinions of graduates. However, it is worth noting that in 2016, new contours were given to the program. It is expected that the undertaken changes are in response to issues identified as negative by the participants of this research.