Mediação e conciliação nos Centros Judiciários de Solução de Conflito e Cidadania: uma reflexão acerca da aplicação dos métodos consensuais de solução de conflito na comarca de Governador Valadares

Abstract

This article claims to analyze the alternative dispute resolution methods, in particular, mediation and conciliation, carried out in Centros Judiciários de Resolução de Conflito e Cidadania (CEJUSC), focusing on the district of Governador Valadares, in Minas Gerais. This study delineates the parameters employed by the unit of the mentioned jurisdiction to determine in which self-composing modality the procedural session will occur, be it conciliation or mediation, along with other elements that influence the choice criteria. Through a critical analysis, it is inferred that such a choice has been misconstructed. One of the primary factors is the Resolução 125/2010 of the CNJ and the imposition of National Goals , by the Courts of Justice, which have encouraged the frantic search for speed. Situation in which conciliation sessions have been prioritized over mediation sessions, even when the most suitables method is shown to be the mediator.