O uso da constelação familiar no judiciário: uma análise crítica a partir da ideia de harmonia coercitiva

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the situation of application of the family constellation (therapeutic practice) in the Judiciary, as an instrument supposedly capable of resolving conflicts in a brief way, facilitating agreements, besides providing, according to its most optimistic defenders, a more humanized treatment of judicial provision to the parties. In this work, the use of family constellations defended as an alternative method of conflict resolution is criticized based on the idea of coercive harmony, especially in view of the attempt to support the institutional use of constellations from the praise of surprising results focused on the number of agreements. In this context, it is believed that the family constellation can be demonstrated as a means of silencing sociopolitical agendas, especially feministones, fostered by the symbiosis between conservative ideas and the privileged search for agreements. The methodology used was theoretical-bibliographic research, of a basic and qualitative nature. The analysis of the rhetoric of the family constellation from the perspective of feminist contributions and the ideology of harmony confirmed the existence of gaps, controversies and tensions that attest to the need for mistrust and caution about the method, in the face of how its diffusion process took place.