Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.ufjf.br/jspui/handle/ufjf/8083
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Impact of social vulnerability on the outcomes of predialysis chronic .pdf251.36 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorTirapani, Luciana dos Santos-
dc.creatorPinheiro, Hélady Sanders-
dc.creatorMansur, Henrique Novais-
dc.creatorOliveira, Dilmerson de-
dc.creatorHuaira, Rosália Maria Nunes Henriques-
dc.creatorHuaira, Carlos Contreras-
dc.creatorGrincenkov, Fabiane Rossi dos Santos-
dc.creatorBastos, Marcus Gomes-
dc.creatorFernandes, Natália Maria da Silva-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T13:14:59Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-12-
dc.date.available2018-11-23T13:14:59Z-
dc.date.issued2015-01-
dc.citation.volume37pt_BR
dc.citation.issue1pt_BR
dc.citation.spage19pt_BR
dc.citation.epage26pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0101-2800.20150004pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufjf.br/jspui/handle/ufjf/8083-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Numerous studies examined the associations between socio-demographic, economic and individual factors and chronic kidney disease (CKD) outcomes and observed that the associations were complex and multifactorial. Socioeconomic factors can be evaluated by a model of social vulnerability (SV). Objective: To analyze the impact of SV on the outcomes of predialysis patients. Methods: Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected from a cohort of patients with predialysis stage 3 to 5 who were treated by an interdisciplinary team (January 2002 and December 2009) in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Factor, cluster and discriminant analysis were performed in sequence to identify the most important variables and develop a model of SV that allowed for classification of the patients as vulnerable or non-vulnerable. Cox regression was performed to examine the impact of SV on the outcomes of mortality and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Results: Of the 209 patients examined, 29.4% were classified as vulnerable. No significance difference was found between the vulnerable and non-vulnerable groups regarding either mortality (log rank: 0.23) or need for RRT (log rank: 0.17). In the Cox regression model, the hazard ratios (HRs) for the unadjusted and adjusted impact of SV on mortality were found to be 1.87 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-5.41) and 1.47 (CI: 0.35-6.0), respectively, and the unadjusted and adjusted impact of need for RRT to be 1.85 (CI: 0.71-4.8) and 2.19 (CI: 0.50-9.6), respectively. Conclusion: These findings indicate that SV did not influence the outcomes of patients with predialysis CKD treated in an interdisciplinary center.pt_BR
dc.description.resumo-pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisher-pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.initials-pt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Nephrologypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectkidney failurept_BR
dc.subjectChronicpt_BR
dc.subjectRenal dialysispt_BR
dc.subjectSocial vulnerabilitypt_BR
dc.subjectSurvivalpt_BR
dc.subjectDiálise renalpt_BR
dc.subjectFalência renal crônicapt_BR
dc.subjectSobrevidapt_BR
dc.subjectVulnerabilidade socialpt_BR
dc.subject.cnpq-pt_BR
dc.titleImpact of social vulnerability on the outcomes of predialysis chronic kidney disease patients in an interdisciplinary centerpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeImpacto da vulnerabilidade social nos desfechos de pacientes com doença renal crônica pré-dialítica em um centro interdisciplinarpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos



Items in DSpace are protected by Creative Commons licenses, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.