Sobrevida e complicações de facetas cerâmicas e de resina: uma revisão integrativa da literatura

Abstract

This study conducted an integrative literature review to compare the durability and complications associated with the use of ceramic and composite resin veneers in anterior teeth, aiming to identify which material offers greater longevity and clinical success in the long term. The review included in vivo studies, randomized clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies, in vitro research, animal studies, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews . These were retrieved through an online search in the PubMed,, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases. The research question was formulated based on the PICO criteria (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome), The population of interest includes dental veneers as an aesthetic or functional treatment, the intervention involves the use of ceramic veneers, the comparison was made with composite resin veneers. Leading to the question: "Is there a difference in survival between ceramic veneers and composite resin veneers?". Twelve articles were deemed eligible, and specific data were tabulated and analyzed. The results indicated that ceramic veneers exhibit greater durability and a lower frequency of failures, such as fractures and discoloration, compared to composite resin veneers, which showed higher susceptibility to discoloration and wear. Additionally, ceramic veneers maintained aesthetic integrity for a longer period. It was concluded that ceramic veneers show better results in terms of longevity and performance compared to composite resin veneers.