Política de avaliação externa bimestral: um estudo sobre sua percepção como ferramenta de gestão pedagógica nas unidades escolares da rede estadual de ensino do Rio de Janeiro

Abstract

This dissertation deals with the perception of school staff and students in relation to external evaluations on a large scale, as a public policy of education. The study was focused on the Education Evaluation System Basic of Rio de Janeiro - SAERJ, in a cut of their bimonthly external evaluation program, called SAERJINHO, which has its own design that differentiates the models adopted in large-scale external evaluation practiced currently in the national and state levels. It is, therefore, an exploratory study with a quantitative and qualitative perspective, focused on the goal of the State Department of Education, in which the results produced by this evaluation model should be converted into grant and direct instrument of action implemented by the school teams as a pedagogical management tool. The research was based on a sample of 130 schools in the education system of Rio de Janeiro, which calculation instrument was a questionnaire for school managers, coordinators, teachers and students, as well as a questionnaire with open questions for a Manager / SEEDUC. To analyze this policy, it relied mainly on the approach of the policy cycle, formulated by Stephen Ball and collaborators (1992). The survey revealed gaps that may interfere with the ownership of this policy as a pedagogical management tool of school units. Based on this observation, it elaborated a proposal for integration and scaling of politics, as a suggestion for a reassessment, favoring the direct participation of stakeholders in order to promote its setting in the context in which it is inserted. It was not intended to universalize the survey results from the objectives of this work, but to indicate possible ways for appropriation of this education policy and its effectiveness in the educational scenario.