A desconstrução de Derrida e a natureza que logo somos

Abstract

This dissertation is developed in order to highlight the crisis of the anthropocene Being through an approximation between the thinking of the philosopher Jacques Derrida and other thinkers who allowed themselves a different look at the natural world. With his proposal of deconstruction, Derrida traces an entire impossibility of a rigid origin of knowledge by contesting the limits of centralized thought causing an extreme rupture between the Being of the individuality of presence and all the heterogeneous potency of countless othernesses. To criticize any conditioning arising from a certain logocentrism is to enable the opening of practices of meaning to a new role in the geological age of humans and their relationship with the other, with the animot and with the multiplicity of living beings. In this way, the deconstruction and the trail of Nature also enter into the problematic of education and science, which would need to reorient their own methodological paradigms in order to provide a resignification of human senses regarding their own performance in the world. This study aims to understand the importance of freeing knowledge from an idealized, conditioning and conditioning centrality, through certain fundamental concepts such as différance and desert, the immanent characteristic of the thought of belonging to a perpetual flow of movement without a limited origin. Deconstruction here appears as a deep dive in search of a totally different otherness, an otherness that blends into the interdependence of Nature. The adopted procedure is specifically a bibliographical research of philosophical and poetic reflection, through an analysis of the social and environmental crises and a search for reorientation of the human praxis in face of its Earth dwelling. Deconstruction invokes the responsibility of rethinking human action that enables and guarantees a more conscious future for humanity itself.