O trabalho da enfermeira na vacinação nas unidades de atenção primária à saúde em um município mineiro

Abstract

This research was formed from the theoretical reference to the UAPS and its developments in the APS, the nurse work and vaccination. Aimed to analyze the work of nurses in vaccination UAPS in a municipality in the Zona da Mata of Minas Gerais, seeking to identify the facilities and difficulties in this work that generate contradictions, conflicts and tensions and describe it in the context of the transformations of UAPS. This is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach that used the dialectic analysis technique in the testimonies of the nurses interviewed in focus groups. This way, the subject synthesized the daily work of nurses in vaccination in UAPS and its implications through the topics: responsible for defining the vaccination room, function room nurse in vaccination of UAPS and work organization in nurses' vaccination UAPS. The objective picture of consciousness was analyzed in approach to permanent education as a subsidy for the work of nurses in vaccination in UAPs and highlighted practices in vaccination of UAPs; formal education of nursing professionals; continuing health education on vaccination. The practice social sector was addressed in two different moments: before and after SUS, the theme of the nurse's work in the context of health policies and immunization. The entire title, it can be observed that the contradictions and conflicts pose challenges for which they should seek alternatives to overcome, being the nurse and the nursing staff represent a social organization through vaccination can conquer your space, giving more visibility to the work that develops and contributes to understanding the dominant phenomena of nursing in the ESF of UAPs. This should be inserted in the discussions on the practice of APS and part of the political, social and emancipatory, glimpsing in the construction of the history of nursing as a social practice. Therefore, it is necessary that the nurse dialogue with peers in the quest for autonomy, the politicization and growth of the profession, in debate and dialogue with sciences and popular culture, in redefining the objects of study and knowledge, and for the well-public welfare, equity and solidarity.