Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufjf.br/jspui/handle/ufjf/9130
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Associative behaviour and antagonism of bovine rumen ciliate (Protista, Ciliophora).pdf1.18 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorD'Agosto, Marta-
dc.creatorGuedes, Paulo Marcos da Matta-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-22T12:27:58Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-20-
dc.date.available2019-02-22T12:27:58Z-
dc.date.issued2001-12-
dc.citation.volume18pt_BR
dc.citation.issue4pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1123pt_BR
dc.citation.epage1126pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752001000400011pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufjf.br/jspui/handle/ufjf/9130-
dc.description.abstractAiming at obtaining the community profile and verifying the occurrence of antagonism and association among ciliates, samples of rumen content were analysed in 100 bovines soon after their death. The animals were killed at the Juiz de Fora Municipal slaughter house (Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais State, Brazil) between August 1996 and May 1997. Ciliates occurred, respectively, in the following percents and samples number: Entodinium Stein, 1859 (50,48; 100), Diplodinium Schuberg, 1888 (5,59; 98), Eudiplodinium Dogiel, 1927 (6,91; 97), Ostracodinium Dogiel, 1927 (9,68; 95), hotricha Stein, 1859 (4,15; 93), Dasytricha Schuberg, 1888 (3,31; 93), Metadi nium Awerinzew & Mutafowa, 1914 (3,06; 90), Eremoplastron Kofoid & MacLennan. 1932 (7,39; 87), Epidinium Crawley, 1923 (5,31; 73), Charonina Strand, 1928 (1,33; 65), Eodinium Kofoid & MacLennan, 1932 (1,49; 59), Diploplastron Kofoid & MacLennan, 1932 (0,88; 24), Elytroplastron Kofoid & MacLennan, 1932 (0,36; 16), Polyplastron Dogiel, 1927 (0,04; 03) and Buetschlia Schuberg, 1888 (0,02; 01). When the antagonistic behaviour and the association were analyzed, it was observed that Eudiplodinium was detected in the absence of Polyplastron and in the presence of Epidinium in 94% and 73% of the samples, respectively. These data confirm the antagonism and the coexistence among particular populations of rumen ciliates and allowed the identification of 94% of the samples examined as being of profile type B, none of type A and 3% of mixed A-B community and of type O. It is suggested the use of the term community profile instead of population profile, as the respective types involve associations of various ciliate populations.pt_BR
dc.description.resumo-pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisher-pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.initials-pt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Zoologiapt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectRumen ciliatept_BR
dc.subjectBehaviourpt_BR
dc.subjectBovinept_BR
dc.subjectCommunity profilept_BR
dc.subjectAntagonismpt_BR
dc.subject.cnpq-pt_BR
dc.titleAssociative behaviour and antagonism of bovine rumen ciliate (Protista, Ciliophora) from Zona da Mata, Minas Gerais State, Brazilpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos de Periódicos



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por licenças Creative Commons, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.