A construção/negociação de papéis e posições em uma atividade híbrida de entrevista-debate

Abstract

This thesis aims to examine how roles and positions assignment and claims are interactionallly negotiated by participants of a debate interview and how this negotiation constructs this hybrid activity. From an interactional perspective in Linguistic (COUPER-KULEN and SELTING, 2001), this study is anchored in theoretical studies about role (SARANGI, 2010, 2011a, 2011b; WEIZMAN, 1996, 2006, 2008) and positioning (LANGENHOVE and HARRÉ, 1999; WEIZMAN, 2008), beyond the conceptualizations that surround the type of activity (SARANGI, 2000; EMMERTSEN, 2007). This research adopts a qualitative and interpretive approach, based on a case study, using the contributions of Conversation Analysis (SACKS, SCHEGLOFF and JEFFERSON, 1974) as an analysis tool. The corpus consists of three editions of Roda Viva TV show that is characterized as an interviews show, in which various themes are raised and discussed by the participants that form the table in each of its editions. The analysis results show that there is a relationship of interactional interdependence between these three constructs – role, position and activity – in activity construction and in roles and positions negotiation.